Barack Hussein Obama and Hitler

[Sicarri]

What is wrong with America when it decides to vote for someone purely based on charisma and oratory skill. Everywhere we turn we hear about how charismatic and a great speaker Obama is. Hate to burst your bubble but Adolf Hitler was also very charismatic and displayed great skill with words! Wake up America!

Fact: Barack Hussein Obama, not 1 or 2 but 3 Islamic names

Fact: Attended a Muslim school in Jakarta for 2 years

Fact: Has a vague voting record

Fact: A Cuban flag with a portrait of Che Guevera is displayed at the Houston campaign HQ's

Fact: Refuses to wear an American flag lapel pin

Fact: Refuses to place his hand over his heart during the National Anthem

Fact: Obama's self professed mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, is quoted as saying "It's not God bless America, it's God d*&n America!"

Fact: Obama's wife has expressed that she has never been proud of America until Obama was in the race

Fact: While Obama is not a member of the CFR, his wife was the director of the Chicago office

Fact: Is a follower of Black Liberation Theology, which is an offshoot of Liberation Theology, and James H. Cone

http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036 (ignore the end of the video as McCain is no angel and needs to be scrutinized as well)

[Passenger]

yeah, Obama is pretty full of it...but then again, what politician isn't?
his rhetoric and hollow promises won't help him once the republican party really gets nasty...and I say that as a non-voter...I'm not voting for McCain either...I just think people are buying into this "obama is here to make some changes and I believe in him stuff" too much...he's a politician who will say whatever it takes to get himself elected...I mean, he denounced his preacher finally, but c'mon, he was a member of that church for years and years and presumably listened to the madness coming out of it for just as long...so, all of a sudden, he doesn't believe in it anymore...
give me a break...

[shoppergirl]

I don't know how someone could sit in a pew for 20 yrs or more and say they didn't know that kind of sermons was going on in his church. Baloney.

[SLAPSHOT]

...and I say that as a non-voter...


"Non-voters" shouldn't say anything, in my opinion. I'm not happy with the presumed candidates either, but it's still my duty to vote. You're only excuse for not voting is that you're too young, and if that's the case, disregard.

[Passenger]

"Non-voters" shouldn't say anything, in my opinion. I'm not happy with the presumed candidates either, but it's still my duty to vote. You're only excuse for not voting is that you're too young, and if that's the case, disregard.

so you'll vote for a candidate even if you think its the wrong choice?

[SLAPSHOT]

so you'll vote for a candidate even if you think its the wrong choice?

No, but if I can't write-in Ron Paul, I will have to vote for someone. In my opinion, it's better to do your research and pick the lesser of two evils than to sit on the sidelines pouting about the candidates. I WILL vote, even if it's a vote against Obama rather than for McCain.

[shoppergirl]

I will vote for someone. That's right even if it's for the lesser of the two evils!!

[AirForceVet]

Same here, and I feel like it has been a matter of choosing the lesser of evils the last couple of rounds.

[sparkys4]

....send lawyers, guns, and money... the **** has hit the fan.....

[just me]

Look up this in snopes.com. I enjoy reading some of the things there when I have a chance. It is very interesting..

Makes me wonder if Obama could have this type of respect.

http://snopes.com/glurge/birdwell.asp

Please respond, I would like to know everyones thoughts on it.

[shoppergirl]

That's a great story. I am sure there are many more acts like that - we never hear about.
Thanks for sharing.

[honda05]

I'll just vote for Alfred E. Neuman like I always do. http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/images/smilies/crazy.gif

[BigTex]

It blows the mind how this dude (Barack) is a candidate for the President of the USA.

[gnreed]

McCain or Obama? Take your pick. I believe we lose either way.

[honda05]

Right on, gn. Neuman would make a better prez than either of these clowns. Too bad he's just a cartoon character.

...But then, so are they.

[konstantin4abilene]

Any time you rely on somebody else to do what you can do for yourself, you are asking to be dissapointed.

[SLAPSHOT]

It blows the mind how this dude (Barack) is a candidate for the President of the USA.


+1

Sadly, I peeled off my Ron Paul stickers yesterday.:( Hold on tight, it's gonna be a rough ride folks.

[WakeUpSheeple]

Well I guess by your logic the headline could read:
Obama, Kennedy, Hitler
Very little experience but very good with words.

[howdy ya'll]

and look at what hitler did, and what obama plans to do and kennedy was successful, but unfortunately, he is no longer here. good with words, obama is that. but talk is cheap. if he gets elected, there will be no point is working hard to earn money, he will take it all and give it to the poor. so in reality, we will be an even more poor nation. with his change, no one will be able to afford gas to go to work, or go on vacations or anything. great change if you ask me.

[pills4everything]

Noun Singular
glurge
Plural
uncountable


glurge

Sickeningly sweet stories with a moral, often hiding slightly sinister undertones.


Like much of the republicn party!!!

[sparky-4]

the town of Hazelton, PA overwhelmingly passed a local law that made it illegal to rent housing to those who are here in our country illegally.

US Disctrict Judge, Munley, (appointed by Clinton) struck it down and called it unconstitutional.

Obama said it was "a victory for all Americans"
here is the link article (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56904)

I don't think the citizens of Hazelton considered it a "victory"

maybe Barack thinks we should not have local laws, only Federal ones, since the throne in DC knows how we subjects should lead our lives.

[howdy ya'll]

wow, and Osama, oh, i mean Obama is running for pres, OPEN ALL BOARDERS, NO PASSPORTS NEEDED, YOU ARE WELCOME IN AMERICA TERRORIST, LETS HAVE TEA!

Did you hear about the mother of 3 living here in America actually turned out to be a terrorist and is planning an attack? I will get the article and post the link....if in fact it is true.

[sparky-4]

why will Barack Obama choose to sit for 20 years under Jeremiah Wright, and listen to that racist hate filled speech and choose to be married by him and allow him to baptize your children?

Only when some of Wright's so-called "sermons" hit the internet did he under much pressure, denounce this hater of America

is that good judgment?... Presidential Judgment?

[WakeUpSheeple]

If you dig deeper, the issues of states rights and constitutional rights often conflict. Sorry, I'm on the side of the constitution every time.period.
But not everyone in this country feels that way though. Some seem to want it both ways. Obama is wrong when falling on the side of the constitution, wrong when seeks to challenge it ( in some minds ).

The Republican smear machine is what has turned me off in the past.
It's working overtime these days.
The truth is out there, but it won't be fed to you. You'll have to find it yourself.


Here's some more of that article:


"Even if federal law did not conflict with Hazleton's measures, the city could not enact an ordinance that violates rights the Constitution guarantees to every person in the United States, whether legal resident or not," Munley wrote.

Munley also wrote that Hazleton's law was at odds with current federal immigration policy, which he said avoids "excessive enforcement" against illegals so as not to jeopardize foreign relations. Hazleton, he said, failed to consider "the implications of the ordinances on foreign policy."

And Obama, in a statement issued by his campaign this week, agreed. “The anti-immigrant law passed by Mayor Barletta was unconstitutional and unworkable – and it underscores the need for comprehensive immigration reform so local communities do not continue to take matters into their own hands,” he said.

[sparky-4]

there hasn't been any states rights since the "War of Northern Aggression"

[sparky-4]

to many Democrats even it seems that Obama's views on abortion are extreme.

First off, a candidate that might be running the country some day and making tough decisions needs to have a few areas settled in his own moral mindset.
But Obama it seems can't even make up his mind as to when life begins.
When ask this question here was his reply
----------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Do you personally believe that life begins at conception?

A: This is something that I have not come to a firm resolution on. I think it's very hard to know what that means, when life begins. Is it when a cell separates? Is it when the soul stirs? So I don't presume to know the answer to that question. What I know is that there is something extraordinarily powerful about potential life and that that has a moral weight to it that we take into consideration when we're having these debates.
Source: 2008 Democratic Compassion Forum at Messiah College Apr 13, 2008
-----------------------------------------------------------------
He voted against the ban on partial birth abortions- a law that would have stopped doctors from stabbing half-born babies in the neck with scissors, suctioning out their brains and crushing their skulls.
His wife Michelle called partial-birth abortion "a legitimate medical procedure," and wouldn't supporters please pay $150 to attend a luncheon for her husband, who would fight against "cynical ploy[s]" to stop it?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
His votes have supported even the most extreme form of abortions.
When a human baby actually survives and abortion attempt, Mr Obama voted that no medical care be allowed to be given and to allow the baby to die.
Many Democrats voted to allow for medical care for the baby if it didn't die as a result of a failed abortion attempt.

------------------------------------------------------------------

He Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion

Reference: Bill S.Amdt.4335 to S.Con.Res.70 ; vote number 08-S071 on Mar 13, 2008

--------------------------------------------------------------------

He Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.

Reference: Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act; Bill S.403 ; vote number 2006-216 on Jul 25, 2006

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[sparky-4]

...If you dig deeper, the issues of states rights and constitutional rights often conflict. Sorry, I'm on the side of the constitution every time.period....


That is good to hear in this day and age:)

how do you feel about the 10th Amendment and Government/Public Schools?

That is a State's Rights and the Constitution claims no provisions for it.

[pills4everything]

For the last 35 yrs women have had control over their bodies and not to man's whim, impulse or conceit.

May every child be a loved and wanted child.

Long live Roe -V- Wade & Planned Parenthood!!!

[sparky-4]

For the last 35 yrs women have had control over their bodies and not to man's whim, impulse or conceit.

May every child be a loved and wanted child.

Long live Roe -V- Wade & Planned Parenthood!!!

48 million and counting... no wonder we are a "blessed" nation;)

[sparky-4]

I think we call this a Freudian slip

Sunday, September 7, 2008
Obama's verbal slip fuels his critics
Christina Bellantoni (Contact)

ST. LOUIS, Mo. - Sen. Barack Obama's foes seized Sunday upon a brief slip of the tongue, when the Democratic presidential nominee was outlining his Christianity but accidentally said, "my Muslim faith."

The three words -- immediately corrected -- were during an exchange with ABC's George Stephanopoulos on "This Week," when he was trying to criticize the quiet smear campaign suggesting he is a Muslim.

But illustrating the difficulty of preventing false rumors about his faith from spreading, anti-Obama groups within one hour of the interview had sliced it out of context and were sending it around via email. They also were blogging about it.

Mr. Obama, who is a Christian and often proudly speaks about how his faith has influenced his public service, said he finds it "deeply offensive" that there are efforts "coming out of the Republican camp to suggest that perhaps I'm not who I say I am when it comes to my faith."

The exchange came after Mr. Obama said that Republicans are attempting to scare voters by suggesting he is not Christian, which McCain campaign manager Rick Davis said was "cynical."

Asked about it on ABC, Mr. Obama said, "These guys love to throw a rock and hide their hand."

"The McCain campaign has never suggested you have Muslim connections," said Mr. Stephanopoulos, who repeatedly interrupted Mr. Obama during the interview.

"I don't think that when you look at what is being promulgated on Fox News, let's say, and Republican commentators who are closely allied to these folks," Mr Obama responded, and Mr. Stephanopoulos interrupted: "But John McCain said that's wrong."

Mr. Obama noted that when Republican vice presidential nominee Gov. Sarah Palin "was forced" to talk about her pregnant 17-year-old daughter, he issued a forceful statement to reporters that the line of inquiry was "off limits." But he said the McCain campaign tried to tie him to "liberal blogs that support Obama" and are "attacking Governor Palin."

"Let's not play games," he said. "What I was suggesting -- you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith. And you're absolutely right that that has not come."

Mr. Stephanopoulos interrupted with, "Christian faith."

"My Christian faith," Mr. Obama said quickly. "Well, what I'm saying is that he hasn't suggested that I'm a Muslim. And I think that his campaign's upper echelons have not, either. What I think is fair to say is that, coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I'm not who I say I am when it comes to my faith -- something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time."

Asked to comment on the accidental misstatement illustrating the difficulty of the issue, Obama spokesman Bill Burton offered this comment: "I'm not surprised that the only outlet doing this story is The Washington Times."

You can view the full context of Mr. Obama's comments on ABC here.

[sparky-4]

video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M)

again, BCHP staff, it would be nice to have the Youtube plug in working for this forum.:D

[howdy ya'll]

Like I have said before, during the very first debate when Obama was asked who he felt our most important allies were, he never mentioned Israel, and when it was brought to his attention, he was at a loss of words on what to say about them.

That raised flags right then. And now this. Makes me really wonder if he really is having slips of the tongue and the truth is coming out about him, he was really cutting down Americans who actually believe in the Bible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2Kh-xzerjE

even cutting down the sermon on the mound..........really........

[WakeUpSheeple]

Bravo Sparky.
We want the whole truth.
I saw the interview and also cringed at the Freudian slip.
Knew it would get sliced and diced and distributed.
If it were true, the other candidates would have jumped at the chance, long ago, to take him down. They see it as a non-issue as do I.
As for the abortion issue, my core beliefs make it very simple in my mind. Does the government have the right to tell you what to do with your own body? And until born, is it not still part of the mothers body and what she chooses to do should be her choice? I may not agree with that choice but it is hers to make. Their will be a judgement day and it will be up to the individual to argue their case in the highest of courts, before the pearly gates.
As for legislating morals, can not and will not work and we should fight that one till the end. To many conflicting arguments. Do you want the government to decide your beliefs for you? They might if you let them. Half of the country would be criminals and even more could be considered accessories, after the fact, to said crimes by not reporting individuals.
As for - when life begins, it may be life at conception but it is not in my opinion, an individual with its own rights until it can sustain life on its own outside the womb.Only god knows when he sees fit to distribute souls but I dought if it is as early as conception. Maybe at the moment it is no longer connected to its mother or during the birthing process.
As for stabbing a living baby, in the act of being born, in the neck, is not abortion its murder. Babymomma and doctors should be held accountable for such an agreegious act.
These are my beliefs and you might not want them rammed down your throat or made law. I would expect you to fight if pushed. I know I sound anti-government but am ready just pro-constitution across the board.

Good to see people debating such issues here.
If we could agree to disagree and be respectful of others views the world world be a better place. We, meaning all people.

[howdy ya'll]

Did you know that an unborn baby can feel pain as early as 6 weeks. That is life. If anything can feel pain, it is a life.

How do I know this... I saw a program in Catholic school, no I am not Catholic, it was a smaller school and my parents wanted smaller classes for me.......ANYWAY........There was an experiment done to see if an unborn baby would move away from pain, and it did.

That is a life.

[sparky-4]

Bravo Sparky.
We want the whole truth.
I saw the interview and also cringed at the Freudian slip.
Knew it would get sliced and diced and distributed.
If it were true, the other candidates would have jumped at the chance, long ago, to take him down. They see it as a non-issue as do I.
As for the abortion issue, my core beliefs make it very simple in my mind. Does the government have the right to tell you what to do with your own body? And until born, is it not still part of the mothers body and what she chooses to do should be her choice? I may not agree with that choice but it is hers to make. Their will be a judgement day and it will be up to the individual to argue their case in the highest of courts, before the pearly gates.
As for legislating morals, can not and will not work and we should fight that one till the end. To many conflicting arguments. Do you want the government to decide your beliefs for you? They might if you let them. Half of the country would be criminals and even more could be considered accessories, after the fact, to said crimes by not reporting individuals.
As for - when life begins, it may be life at conception but it is not in my opinion, an individual with its own rights until it can sustain life on its own outside the womb.Only god knows when he sees fit to distribute souls but I dought if it is as early as conception. Maybe at the moment it is no longer connected to its mother or during the birthing process.
As for stabbing a living baby, in the act of being born, in the neck, is not abortion its murder. Babymomma and doctors should be held accountable for such an agreegious act.
These are my beliefs and you might not want them rammed down your throat or made law. I would expect you to fight if pushed. I know I sound anti-government but am ready just pro-constitution across the board.

Good to see people debating such issues here.
If we could agree to disagree and be respectful of others views the world world be a better place. We, meaning all people.

in most states, you can go to prison for murder when you cause and unborn child to die inside of the mother.
you face charges of death to the baby.. separate from the mother



Moses even gave law in the old Testament about such a situation.

funny to me how one state can protect a womans right to kill the baby inside her and then send a person to prison for doing the same thing during an attack or car accident